Re: Engine & trans. oil

["Gerald A. Henry" <met57@freewwweb.com>]

Jerry

You grew up on a farm, didn't you?  Are you still using un-pasteurised milk?
No, I didn't think so.  Why would you use the old type of oil when a much
better product is now available?  Today's multi-weight, detergent oils, are
so much better for your engine, you would be a fool not to use them.

If you find that you start to use oil after going to them, then that is
because you have cleaned all the crap and corruption out of the engine that
had accumulated over the years of miss-use.  The burning would NOT be the
fault of the oil, but of the lack of proper maintenance.  You would have
just been living on borrowed time.

Gerald



----- Original Message -----
From: "Jerry R Christensen -" <jrc@mninter.net>
To: <metropolitan@listserv.azstarnet.com>
Sent: Monday, May 29, 2000 6:27 PM
Subject: Re: Engine & trans. oil


> if the engine is original - stay with original kinda oil --- if
> ur on top of Mount Shasta (?) then use different grades --- if ur
> along the coast u can use the same grade -- California has
> nothing to do with it -- it's quite a ways from the north end to
> the southern end u no -- as well as from top to bottom --
>
> SKY58@aol.com wrote:
> >
> > The specs for engine oil above 32* is sae 40. The specs for trans. above
32*
> > is sae 30
> > In California is it ok to use one sae grade for both engine and trans.
and if
> > so, which would it be? Should I even stay with sae oil or switch to a 10
w 30.
> > Jeff P
>
>